Feasibility of bubble continuous positive airway pressure in secondary facilities in low and middle income countries

Main Article Content

Robert B. Clark Siena F. Davis Michael K. Visick Richard E. Bell


Background: Newborn respiratory distress is a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality in developing countries. While there have been considerable reductions in child mortality in low and middle income countries (LMIC) in recent years, reductions in neonatal mortality have not been as substantial. Bubble CPAP (bCPAP), mechanical CPAP, and mechanical ventilation are all used to treat respiratory distress syndrome and other pulmonary complications in newborns. Methods: This study reviews the evidence for the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of bCPAP in neonates with respiratory distress in secondary facilities in LMIC. A systematic search (January 2014–January 2018) was performed of MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Articles reporting on bCPAP for respiratory distress in infants <28 days of age in hospitals in LMIC were included in the qualitative synthesis.

Results: Three studies reported on bCPAP in secondary hospitals. The majority of infants given bCPAP survived to discharge. The most commonly reported complication of bCPAP was nasal irritation. CPAP and bCPAP use is increasing in LMIC, but appears limited to urban tertiary care centers. There is a paucity of information in the medical literature regarding bCPAP use in secondary settings.

Conclusion: There is evidence that bCPAP, when used in tertiary care settings in LMIC is feasible, safe, effective, reduces the need for mechanical ventilation and ventilator CPAP, and may improve survival. There is very limited evidence supporting the feasibility of bCPAP use in secondary facilities in LMIC.

Key words: bubble CPAP, respiratory distress, tertiary setting, low and middle income countries

Article Details

How to Cite
CLARK, Robert B. et al. Feasibility of bubble continuous positive airway pressure in secondary facilities in low and middle income countries. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 5, may 2018. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://journals.ke-i.org/index.php/mra/article/view/1779>. Date accessed: 25 may 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v6i5.1779.
Review Articles


1. Martin S, Duke T, & Davis P. Efficacy and safety of bubble CPAP in neonatal care in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99: F495-F504. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305519

2. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, et al. Every newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014;384(9938):189–205.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7

3. Dunn MS, Kaempf J, de Klerk A, et al. Randomized Trial Comparing 3 Approaches to the Initial Respiratory Management of Preterm Neonates. Pediatr. 2011. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3848

4. Early Lung Recruitment for Newborns > 34 Weeks Gestation Clinical Pathway & Order Set. Clinical Guide. Intermountain Healthcare, 2015, SLC Utah

5. Ambey R, & Gogia P. Continuous positive airway pressure: the light that really does keep monster from baby away. Int J Ped Res Prac. 2015;1(1):3-6.

6. Dewez JE, & van den Broek N. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to treat respiratory distress in newborns in low-and middle-income countries. Trop Doc. 2016:0(0):1-3.
doi: 10.1177/0049475516630210

7. Kawaza K, Machen HE, Brown J, et al. Efficacy of a low-cost bubble CPAP system in treatment of respiratory distress in a neonatal ward in Malawi. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e86327.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086327

8. Audu LI, Otuneye AT, Mairami AB, & Mukhtar MY. Improvised bubble continuous positive airway pressure (BCPAP) device at the National Hospital Abuja gives immediate improvement in respiratory rate and oxygenation in neonates with respiratory distress. Niger J Paed. 2015:42(1):12-16. doi: 10.4314/njp.v42i1,4

9. Urs PS, Khan F, & Maiya PP. Bubble CPAP--A primary respiratory support for respiratory distress syndrome in Newborns. Indian Pediatr. 2009;46(5):409-411.

10. Tagare A, Kadam S, Vaidya U, Pandit A., & Patole S. Bubble CPAP versus ventilator CPAP in preterm neonates with early onset respiratory distress—a randomized controlled trial. J Trop Pediatr. 2013;59(2):113-119.
doi: 10.1093/tropej/fms061

11. Jensen EA, Chaudhary A, Bhutta ZA, & Kirpalani H. Non-invasive respiratory support for infants in low-and middle-income countries. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;1-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.02.003 [In Press]

12. Rezzonico R, Caccamo LM, Manfredini V, et al. Impact of the systematic introduction of low-cost bubble nasal CPAP in a NICU of a developing country: a prospective pre-and post-intervention study. BMC Pediatr.2015;15(26):1-9
doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0449-x

13. Tagare A, Kadam S, Vaidya U, Pandit A, & Patole S. A pilot study of comparison of BCPAP vs. VCPAP in preterm infants with early onset respiratory distress. J Trop Pediatr. 2009;56(3):191-194. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmp092

14. McAdams RM, Hedstrom AB, DiBlasi RM, et al. Implementation of bubble CPAP in a rural Ugandan neonatal ICU. Respir Care. 2015;60(3):437-445.
doi: 10.4187/respcare.03438

15. Yadav S, Thukral A, Sankar MJ, et al. Bubble vs conventional continuous positive airway pressure for prevention of extubation failure in preterm very low birth weight infants: a pilot study. Indian J Pediatr. 2012;79(9):1163-1168. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0651-2

16. Koyamaibole L, Kado J, Qovu JD, Colquhoun S, & Duke T. An evaluation of bubble-CPAP in a neonatal unit in a developing country: effective respiratory support that can be applied by nurses. J Trop Pediatr. 2006;52(4):249-253. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmi109

17. Chen A, Deshmukh AA, Richards-Kortum R, Molyneux E, Kawaza K, & Cantor SB. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a low-cost bubble CPAP device in providing ventilatory support for neonates in Malawi–a preliminary report. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12887-014-0288-1

18. Bahman-Bijari B, Malekiyan A, Niknafs P, & Baneshi MR. Bubble–CPAP vs. ventilatory–CPAP in preterm infants with respiratory distress. Indian J Pediatr. 2011; 21(2):151-158. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fms061

19. Van Den Heuvel M, Blencowe H, Mittermayer K et al. Introduction of bubble CPAP in a teaching hospital in Malawi. Ann Trop Med. 2011;31(1):59-65. doi: 10.1179/1465328110Y.0000000001

20. Nahimana E, Ngendahayo M, Magge H, et al. Bubble CPAP to support preterm infants in rural Rwanda: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15:1-7. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0449-x

21. Thukral A, Sankar MJ, Chandrasekaran A, Agarwal R, & Paul VK. Efficacy and safety of CPAP in low-and middle-income countries. J Perinatol. 2016;36:S21-S28. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.29

22. Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, Woolf SH, Susman J, Ewigman B, et al. Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69:549-57.

23. Ntigurirwa P, Mellor K, Langer D, et al. A health partnership to reduce neonatal mortality in four hospitals in Rwanda. Glob Health. 2017;13(28): 1-7. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0252-6

24. Hundalani SG, Richards-Kortum R, Oden M, Kawaza K, Gest A, & Molyneux E. Development and validation of a simple algorithm for initiation of CPAP in neonates with respiratory distress in Malawi. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100:F332–F336.
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-308082

25. Gupta S, & Donn, SM. Continuous positive airway pressure: physiology and comparison of devices. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;204-211. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.02.009

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.