Is Array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization Useful for Children with Apparently Isolated Congenital Anomalies?

Main Article Content

Vijay S. Tonk Golder N. Wilson

Abstract

To consider the utility of array-comparative genomic hybridization patients with apparently isolated congenital anomalies, 109 patients whose indication for testing was a birth defect without other concerns about syndromes or intellectual disability were selected from 1766 analyses conducted from 2009 to 2017. Twenty-nine had copy number variants more likely to contribute to the birth defect and another 80 were potentially contributory. Defects of the central nervous (23 patients), cardiovascular (20), digestive (19), and pulmonary (9) systems predominated with some high prevalence variants, traditionally reported as benign, recurring in particular anomaly cases. This small number of anomaly-associated copy number variants does not provide a definitive answer to the title question.  However, the value of further studies is supported by consideration of the polygenic inheritance/multifactorial determination of congenital malformations, their derivation from common developmental fields, and their possible prediction by determination of copy number variant profiles.    

Article Details

How to Cite
TONK, Vijay S.; WILSON, Golder N.. Is Array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization Useful for Children with Apparently Isolated Congenital Anomalies?. International Biology Review, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 3, aug. 2018. ISSN 2572-7168. Available at: <https://journals.ke-i.org/index.php/ibr/article/view/1810>. Date accessed: 14 dec. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/ibr.v2i3.1810.
Section
Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.