Main Article Content
There are many excavation centres in Anatolia, most combining international and national teams. Facial reconstruction has been done for many purposes, from forensic medicine to surgical requirement. Recently, it has become favourable in historical findings. Although there are a few techniques for face construction, ethnicity, geography, and age of the skeleton should be taken into account. The aim of this study is to make a facial reconstruction using a different approach, using soft tissue thickness that specifically belongs to the Anatolian people. In the present study, a face is defined using four steps to reach a more accurate construction for Anatolians. First, a skeleton was examined, then soft tissue thickness determined by predefined-MRI pool data, followed by x-ray computed tomography of the skull, and finally, computer aided correction. At the end of this protocol, the face was reconstructed in the best way. Also, for the first time, it was printed using a 3D printer for further analysis and display. The skeleton was found in Topraklık-Bursa (West Anatolia) excavation. The skull was aged about 8500 years old, gender determined as female from examination of the whole skeleton. All measurements of the whole skeleton and facial reconstruction showed high similarities to the people who lived in this region in history.
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
Boz, B., Özdemir M. B., Özer, A., Boz, A. ,(2012). Processing of facial reconstruction from skull: ABAB method (new model). Int J Legal Med, 126.
Claes, P., Vandermeulen, D., Greef, S.D., Willems, G., Suetens P., (2006). Craniofacial reconstruction using a combined statistical model of face shape and soft tissue depths: Methodology and validation. Forensic Sci Int, 159, 147–158.
Clement, J.G., Marks, M. K., Computer Graphic Facial Reconstruction, (2005). Elsevier.
Çağdır, A. S. (1997). Kimlik Tespitinde Fasiyal Rekonstruksiyonun Yeri, Tıpta Uzmanlık Tezi, Adli Tıp Kurumu Başkanlığı, İstanbul.
Iscan, M. Y., & Helmer R. P. (eds.), (1993). Forensic Analysis of the Skull. Wiley-Liss, New York, 199-213.
Karul, N., Özeren. Ö., (2007). Aktopraklık Höyüğü Kazı Çalışmaları, Türk Eskiçağ Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Haberler 23, İstanbul, 19-20.
Mays, S., (1998). The Archaelogy of Human Bones. Routledge, London and New York.
Midori, A. A., Ricanek, K. J., (2008). The Morph Database: Investigating the effects of adults craniofacial aging on automated Face-Recognition Technology, Forensic Science Commuications, 10, 2.
Miyasaka, S., (1999). Progress in Facial Reconstruction Technology. Forensic Science Review 11(1), 51–90. Central Police University Press, Kashiwanoha, Japan, NRIPS.
Prag, J., & Neave, R., (1997). Making Faces: Using Forensic and Archaeological Evidence. Butler and Tanner Ltd, London.
Sever, M., (2007). Adli antropoloji: yeniden yüzlendirme çalışmalarında mevcut yumuşak doku kalınlık cetvellerinin Türkiye’de uygulanabilirliği, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara .
Stefan, C. N., & Henneberg, M., (2001). Building faces from dried skulls: are they recognised above chance rates. J. Forensic Sci, 46, 432–440.
Teke, H. Y. et al., (2010). Assesment of the thickness of face soft tissue using magnetic resonance: Ankara sample. Adli Tıp Dergisi, 24-3, 24–36.
Wilkinson, C., (2004). Forensic facial reconstruction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Vincent, M. P., (2001). Skeletal remains identification by facial reconstruction. Forensic Science Commuications, 3, 1.
Woźniak, K., Woźniak, E. R., Moskała, A., Pohl, J., Latacz, K., Dybała, B., (2012) Weapon identification using antemortem computed tomography with virtual 3D and rapid prototype modeling—A report in a case of blunt force head injury, Forensic Sci Int, 222, 29-32