HOME | LOG IN | SIGN UP

Applicability of a new driving training protocol for post-stroke clients

Melanie Couture, Claude Vincent, Isabelle Gélinas

Abstract


Background - Very little is known about driving training techniques for post-stroke clients and there is a need to regroup the most efficient and feasible techniques to improve this important aspect of rehabilitation. Survey’s results and a literature review recently highlighted the relevance of creating a new driving training protocol for subjects with stroke and cognitive limitations. The objectives of this research article are to present the development of a new driving protocol and show its applicability was tested in clinical context.

 

Methods - The 1st research design was a content validation to ensure the choice of the driving training methods and the elaboration of the training protocol in 9 levels. A pilot was done to pre-test its applicability (2nd research design). The setting of the research was in a Driving rehabilitation program in a rehab center. The participants involved were occupational therapist specialists (n=5) and post-stroke clients (n=5). On road re-evaluation was used, as well as off-road evaluations before and after the training protocol: Motor Free Visual Test, Trail Making Test, Useful Field Of View, Bells Test and Automatic Brake Reaction Timer.

 

Results - Adapted commentary driving and on-road training were perceived as being the most effective training methods. The protocol was feasible: training was completed in one month with 100% of participation. Three to seven training sessions (one hour) were needed to complete the 6 levels of adapted commentary driving and, to achieve the last 3 levels of the protocol, 4 behind-the-wheel training sessions were done.

 

Conclusion - This clinical protocol gives a better tool to rehabilitation specialists to train their post-stroke clients having cognitive limitations considering the specific and complex demands of the activity of driving.


Keywords


Mild cognitive impairment, motor vehicle, rehabilitation, on-road assessment

Full Text:

References


Akinwuntan, A.E., De Weerdt, W., Feys, H., Pauwels, J., Baten, G., Arno, P., & Kiekens, C. (2005). Effect of simulator training on driving after stroke. Neurology, 65, 843-851.

Ball, K., Beard, B.L., Roencker, D.L., Miller, R.L., & Griggs, D.S. (1988). Age and visual search: expanding the useful field of view. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 5, 2210-9.

Ball, K., & Owsley, C. (1992). The useful field of view test: a new technique for evaluating age-related declines in visual function. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 63, 71-9.

Belchior, P.D. (2007). Cognitive training with video games to improve driving skills. Doctoral dissertation research, University of Florida, 209 pp.

Bouska, M.J., & Kwatny, E. (1982). Manual for application of the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test to the adult population. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Rehabilitation Research and Training Center.

Classen, S., Horgas, A., Awadzi, K., Messinger-Rapport, B., Shechtman, O., & Joo, Y.S. (2008). Clinical predictors of older driver performance on a standardized road test. Traffic Injury Prevention, 9(5), 456-62.

Colarusso, R.P., & Hammill, D.D. (1972). MVPT Manual. Motor-free visual perception test. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.

Corriveau. D. (1997). Techniques de conduite avancées [Advanced driving technique] . Ottawa, ON: Les Éditions dynamiques.

Corriveau, D., & Bernard, L. (2008) Techniques de conduite préventive [Defensive driving technique]. Nicolet, QC: Denis Corriveau.

Couture, M., Vincent, C., & Gelinas, I. (2012). Enquête concernant l’entraînement des fonctions cognitives en vue de la conduite automobile. ErgOThérapies, 47, 5-14.

Crotty, M., & George, S. (2009). Retraining visual processing skills to improve driving ability after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90(12), 2096-102.

Dickerson, A., Reistetter, T., Parnell, M., Robinson, S., Stone, K., & Whitley, K. (2008). Standardizing the RT-2S brake reaction time tester. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 27(2), 96-106.

Fillion, G. (2010). Conduite ergo dirigée en réadaptation [OT modified commentary driving in rehabilitation]. Course Notes, Entraînement des capacités à conduire [Training to drive]. Montreal, PQ: McGill University.

Fisk, G.D, Owsley, C., & Pulley, L.V. (1997). Driving after stroke: Driving exposure, advice, and evaluations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 1338-45.

Galski, T., Bruno, L.R. & Ehle, H.T. (1992). Driving after cerebral damage: a model with implications for evaluation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 324-32.

Gauthier, L., Dehaut, F. & Joannette, Y. (1989). The Bells Test: a quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11, 49-54.

Gershkoff, A.M., & Finestone, H.M. (2009). Driving after stroke. In Stein J, Zorowitz R, Harvey R, Macko R, Winstein C, eds. Stroke Recovery & Rehabilitation. New York, NY: Demos Medical Publishing, p 697-711.

Griffen, J.A., Rapport, L.J., Bryer, R.C., & Scott, C.A. (2009). Driving status and community integration after stroke. Topics in Stoke Rehabilitation, 16 (3), 212-21.

Jones, R., Giddens, H., & Croft, D. (1983). Assessment and training of brain-damaged drivers. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37(11), 754-60.

Kewman, D.G., Seigerman, C., Kintner, H., Chu, S., Henson. D., & Reeder, C. (1985). Simulation training on psychomotor skills, teaching the brain-injured to drive. Rehabilitation Psychology, 30(1), 11-27.

Klonoff, P.S., Olson, K.C., Talley, K.L.H., Myles, S.M., Gehrels, J.A., & Dawson, L.K. (2010). The relationship of cognitive retraining to neurological patients’ driving status: The role of process variables and compensation training. Brain Injury, 24(2), 63-73.

Legh-Smith, J., Wade, D.T., & Langton Hewer, R. (1986). Driving after a stroke. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 79, 200-3.

Marshall, S.C., Molnar, F., Man-Son-Hing, M., Blair, R., Brosseau, L, Finestone, H.M. et al. (2007). Predictors of driving ability following stroke: a systematic review. Topics in Stoke Rehabilitation, 14(1), 98-114.

Mazer, B.L., Korner-Bitensk, N., & Sofer, S. (1998). Predicting ability to drive after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79(7), 743-50.

Mazer, B.L., Sofer, S., Korner-Bitensky, N., Gelinas, I., Hanley, J., & Wood-Dauphinee, S. (2003). Effectiveness of a visual attention retraining program on the driving performance of clients with stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 541-50.

Michon, J.A. (1985). A critical view of driver behaviour models. In: Evans, L., Schwing, R.C., eds. Human Behavior and Traffic Safety. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Myers, R.S., Ball, K.K., Kalina, T.D., Roth, D., & Goode, K.T. (2000). Relation of useful field of view and other screening tests to on-road driving performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 279-90.

Petzold, A., Korner-Bitensky, N., Rochette, A., Teasell, R., Marshall, S., & Perrier, M.J. (2010). Driving post-stroke: problem identification, assessment use, and interventions offered by Canadian occupational therapists. Topics in Stoke Rehabilitation, 17(5), 371-9.

Quigley, F.L., & DeLisa, J.A. (1983). Assessing the driving potential of cerebral vascular accident patients. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37(7), 474-8.

Ranney, T.A. (1994). Models of driving behaviour: A review of their evolution. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26(6), 733-50.

Sivak, M., Hill, C.S., Henson, D.L., Butler, B.P., Silber, S.M., & Olson, P.L. (1984). Improved driving performance following perceptual training in persons with brain damage. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 65, 163-6.

Söderstrom, S.T., Pettersson, R.P., & Leppert, J. (2006). Prediction of driving ability after stroke and the effect of behind-the-wheel training. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 419-29.

Strauss, E., Sherman, E.M.S., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, p 655-77.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18103/mra.v0i3.208

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.